Sunday, July 31, 2022

Revisiting Battle Of Sangshak

* Ted Hockings, Basil Seaton and Lt Col Hopkinson , one day before the battle starts
Revisiting Battle of Sangshak I am a WW 2 relic collector. During my normal visit to various battle sites of WW2 for collection of world war relics, i happen to find lot of slit trenches and bunkers still in good conditions. This create a subtle interest in me to study exactly what happen in those trenches and bunkers during battle. Sangshak is yet such a place where i enjoyed visiting again and again. Talking with aged people who were an eye witness was really fun. More fun is when i started sharing information with veterans who took part in the battle. An account of each one of them speak of the harsh days without food and water. Maurice Bell, the then second in command of the royal signal attach with the 50th para brigade at Sangshak gave me his account of the battle as below:- Snipers:- It became customary for Brigade HQ officers to gather near the HQ at around 1pm for “lunch”. There was little to eat but it was an opportunity to exchange information on the progress of the battle and generally update ourselves on what was happening. It was usually fairly quiet at this time with both sides preparing for the evening attacks. However, on one occasion, the peace was shattered by a stream of bullets and our very rapid dispersal. It still seems a miracle that no one was even wounded. Nobody could explain how the sniper had managed to infiltrate so far into our “box” but his skill and bravery must have been of the highest order. As he must have foreseen, his own death came within seconds. We continued to meet for “lunch” – but took much greater care. There were enough casualties without our adding to them in an irresponsible way. Dead Gurkhas:- I had a personal slit trench near the Signals Office in the Brigade HQ area. It was shallow but long enough for me to lie down and grab a couple of hours sleep whenever operations allowed. It also stored my scanty personal kit. Two or three days after the start of the battle I found that someone had installed a mortar alongside the trench. This seemed unsociable, to say the least, but I was much too busy to argue. However the matter was quickly resolved by a direct hit from the Japanese artillery. And I was left to pick pieces of dead Gurkhas out of my bedding roll and kit. I don’t remember any qualms, or even distaste, at having to do this though I now feel physically sick at the thought. By that stage of the fighting I must have been inured to the sight of shattered bodies and human blood. It was also a fact that sooner or later – and probably sooner – I would meet the same fate. Moving round the “box” at night:- The problem was that the Japs were clever at infiltrating and the “front line” was never far away, wherever you were in the “box”. It was good sense to avoid moving around after dusk but sometimes, when a job overran the time estimated or where a problem had arisen which demanded my attention, there was no alternative. Each night a password was allocated and this, in theory, should have distinguished friend from foe. The problem was that, whatever language was chosen for the password, it would be a foreign language for more than half the defending forces. Could the challenged person say the word quietly but clearly? Could the challenger recognise the word? It was always an enormous relief to reach HQ in one piece. Sharing the salt:- It was a long and difficult walk from Sangshak to Imphal and I made it in the company of one British sergeant from the mountain battery, three or four Indians and a similar number of Gurkhas. We had met by chance during the break out. We were all tired before we began and none of us had eaten much over several days. But we pressed on, using tracks which we hoped were too insignificant to be manned by the Japanese. We had no food but we did have opportunities to drink from mountain streams. And the perspiration pouring from us drained our bodies of salt. After some three or four days we came to a Naga village that had not, up to then, been occupied by the Japs and we gratefully accepted their offer of food. But, most of all we craved salt. I shall never forget standing in a circle and passing a piece of rock salt from mouth to mouth. Round and round it went, with never a thought of race, colour or creed. Our bodies were all the same – suffering severe depletion of common salt. With so many troubles in the world stemming from tribal or racial differences, or variations in skin colour, or competing religions I often recall that sharing of the rock salt!
The legendary Soldier Basil Seaton on his account over his escape from the Japanese has written me the following snippet.
" I joined the 152 Indian Para Bn in december 1943 and Sangshak was March 44, so i was not a long time para. Furthermore, I was seriously wounded the first morning of the actual Sangshak battle, treated in Field Ambulance and kept sedated. Wounded and left for dead upon the Brigade evacuation, I was kicked awake next morning by a Japanese soldier.... he was as startled as i was, but i hit him below the belt and scuttled off into the jungle, diving into heavy undergrowth. when it was dark, i crept down the tract to get out of the Sangshak village clearing and head for Imphal....... Before i made it a second japanese soldier came up the track. I lay motionless but he put his hand on my head... my only weapon was the para. fighting knife. In a brief struggle i stuck my knife into his stomack and then his neck and it was all over. Lastly , a three days twenty-five miles hike without ration, but i was helped by two grenades from a dead soldier ( for catching fish). I finally reach the Imphal plain and a company commanded by an old friend.
I was alloted a mortar platoon and at first contact, we were deployed to join C company but the japanese got there before we did. We rejoined the main body to go through the events. As far as expert evidence is concern, most of those poor sould are death eg . Jimmy Roberts(153), Allan Cowell, Paul Lewis, John Ball and of course Colonel Hopkinson and others. The Book Imphal is an excellent , accurate account of what happen. 50(P) Bde in a "patrol" role was in no state to hold the majorJapanese offensive which exploded. We had not even got barbed wire to stall enemy probes and many of those involved were new to jungle warfare--- they died bravely, terribly outnumbered by the japanese offensive.
The japanese offensive was a complete surprise. even when the first party of fifty attacked the V Force positions there was no great alarm. Not until Japanese troops of 31 Division attacked our C company was there any realisation that the attack was in overwhelming strength. they had with them troops of the renegade indian national Army, who kept calling out in urdu inviting Indian survivors to come out and be fed. I didn't go !! There was some bitterness felt by Sangshak and other survivors in that the BRitish deployed positions in general followed parallel to the Chinwin river, in a straight line with no depth, and were in turn served by the line of supply.It was transparently obvious even to junior officers that an attack like Kohima, would cut off most of the Imphal threatre. Harry Seaman's book page 86, second paragraph " now just two days into the siege............" , gives a clear picture as to how aware officers and men realised that there had been an awful blunder somewhere. There was also a trend to decry the 50(P) Bde performance as "newcomers" to Burma. It was not until the Commander-in- Chief general Slim lauded their performance as saving the Imphal force from a disastrous defeat by the two japanese division- describe by the Japanese themselves as "marching on Delhi"- that the ugly rumours ceased. In the meantime, Brig. Hope-thomson had been send home as a lieutenant-colonel9to win a DSO later in Germany). there were fewer decorations than would be expected from such an heroic battles as Sangshak. 152 parachute Battalion was left with only four officers not killed or wounded( out of the twenty- eight total) and thereby unable to take part in the forthcoming Singapore invasion".

Wednesday, May 18, 2022

ARCHANA AND UNBI: THE TWIN ARCHEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES

 

INTRODUCTION

       In 2013, an unknown ground layout was discovered at Maklang through Google satellite image. It has an eight pointed star inside an outer complex. The layout was designed with proper geometric symmetry. The government had declared the location as a protected site under the Manipur Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1976.

 

      In 2015, another such ground layout was noticed by Christopher Johnson near Kanglatongbi from an aerial reconnaissance picture taken during World War II and the author had reported it as “Johnson Star” in his paper presented on 8th June 2015 in the “Seminar On Maklang Bihu Loukon” held at Kangla Hall and organised by Manipur State Archaeology Department, Apokpa Research Centre & Bihu Loukon Star Shape and Land Protection Committee Maklang.

 

       On January 8th, 2021, two ground layouts were notice by the author and Christopher Johnson from an aerial reconnaissance picture taken during World War II. The ground layout on the west was named as Unbi and the one on the east as Archana. Jointly the two layouts are being addressed as “Archana and Unbi”. “Archana and Unbi” is not a natural formation and it points to a historical site built with the effort of an authority. It has structural and functional importance as far has history is concern. The locals are not aware of the shape of the layout and physically it cannot be ascertained by looking from the ground. Present satellite photography from Google does not show the whole boundary of the layout and as such is not distinct. Only the northern side of both the layouts can be seen and noticed from ground and from satellite images.

 

 DISCOVERY

      The discovery came about during the course of ongoing research into the Second World War battlefields and military locations around the Imphal Plain being undertaken by the author and Christopher Johnson. To help with these projects official documents recorded at the time of the war were used as well as many unpublished records and previously unavailable photographic images.

 

                                 Picture 1:  Aerial Image of the structure taken in 1944.

 

The well documented battle site at “Lion Box” Kanglatongbi and Sekmai were being investigated for further evidence using aerial reconnaissance images. One Kilometre  to the north of  Sekmai Bazar, a strange geometrical shape stood out from the rest of the terrain and under magnification appeared to be two symmetric layouts, one  adjacent to  the other.

 

        The aerial images had been taken on the 21st of April 1944 at a height of many thousands of feet but were good enough to show this was not a natural feature and definitely not any wartime defensive area or installation but perhaps an archaeological site of importance.  The lines on the landscape looked to be either paddy-field bunds or walls, or ditches. On the April 1944 image, some area at the south west of “Archana” was occupied with human habitation but 50 percent of area under “Unbi” was occupied with houses.  Modern satellite images from Google Earth of the area were then used for further enhanced viewing. A field visit was made at the site on 1st of April 2021 and closer scrutiny of the whole area revealed there are likely presence of watch tower and water moat around the external boundary of the structures.

 

LOCATION

     “Archana and Unbi” are located around the area of Sekmai Sabal Leikai and Sekmai Khunou respectively. It comes under Imphal West District, PO & PS Sekmai, Manipur, India.   “Archana and Unbi” are located on the western side of Imphal-Dimapur road. The eastern edge of “Archana” is only 100 metres from the National Highway (Imphal-Dimapur road)  and one kilometre from Sekmai Bazar due north. The centre of “Archana” stands at latitude 24.950695° and longitude 93.878628° with an elevation of 2734 feet above mean sea level. The centre of “Unbi” stands at latitude 24.950782° and longitude 93.872225° with an elevation of 2754 feet above mean sea level.

 

 DESCRIPTION

                ‘Archana’ and ‘Unbi’ are similar in shape and size. The layout on the ground from site visit indicates as a square shape earthwork enclosure with four external rectangle extended from each sides of the square.  The earthwork was constructed by digging up the outer boundary of the structure. The outer boundary thus formed a defensive water moat. There is an extended higher ground on the edge of the boundary, which gives a better view of the surrounding landscape and the structure itself.

 Picture 2 : Aerial Picture of 1944 showing the twin structure.           Picture 3:-Marked twin fort in 1944 aerial Picture

 

Measurement of the perimeter earth work in each structure showed 20 feet in breath with the water moat measuring 15 feet width.   Measurements using the tools available with the Google Earth programme showed the earthwork is 2.25 km in length.  With time, erosion and degradation of the earthen structure had occurred and at the highest point, we can still find 4 feet high earthwork.  During the ensuing seventy seven years since the aerial images were taken the area has been developed with significant housing inside ‘Archana’ and ‘Unbi’ but the original lines were still visible to the experienced eye.

 



Picture 4  : Present Google Image of ARCHANA and UNBI.

 

           There are 20 edge(corner) in each structure. If we join this 20 edge, the structure can be drawn.

 

The coordinates of the 20 edges of ‘Archana’ are given below

1.  24.953379°   93.877710°

2.  24.953383°   93.879519°

3.  24.952518°   93.879495°

4.  24.952520°    93.880351°

5.  24.951875°     93.880415°

6.  24.951792°     93.881405°

7.   24.949891°    93.881268°

8.   24.949888°    93.880396°

9.   24.949141°    93.880316°

10.   24.949157°    93.879353°

11.   24.948389°    93.879321°

12.   24.948471°     93.877450°

13.    24.949231°    93.877428°

14.   24.949304°     93.876490°

15.   24.949944°   93.876562°

16.   24.950118°    93.875646°

17.   24.951752°     93.875717°

18.   24.951654°    93.876716°

19.   24.952359°    93.876762°

20.    24.952406°    93.877782°

 

The coordinates of the 20 edges of ‘Unbi’ are given below

1.      24.95360°   93.87136°  ( Mound, watch tower  present today)

2.      24.953502°   93.873170° ( Mound, watch tower  present today)

3.      24.952606°    93.873113°

4.      24.952591°   93.874075°

5.      24.951867°   93.874058°

6.       24.951873°    93.874967°

7.       24.950123°     93.874933°

8.        24.950115°    93.874162°

9.         24.949212°     93.874240°

10.     24.949325°     93.873293°

11.      24.948440°     93.873192°

12.     24.948471°       93.871198°

13.     24.949272°    93.871134°

14.      24.949323°    93.870314°

15.     24.950140°     93.870449°

16.     24.950179°     93.869456°

17.    24.951834°     93.869526°

18.      24.951765°  93.870337°

19.     24.952696°     93.870362°

20.     24.952613°    93.871288°

 

The layout as seen from Aerial as well as Satellite images are formed by earth systematically dumped from the digging of the outer moat along the boundary.

 

      The above are all approximate measurements and ground measurements using lasers and GPS will be needed for any real accuracy.  The exact shape and size of the structure can also be known through proper laser guided mapping and survey.

 

 

 Picture 5 : The remains of gorges ( Water Moat) outside the boundary of ‘UNBI’

 

 

THE STRUCTURE THROUGH THE AGES

        During the ensuing seventy seven years since the aerial reconnaissance images of the location were taken by Allied Forces, the area has been developed with significant housing inside ‘Archana’ and ‘Unbi’ . The earthwork and mounds have been levelled for human accommodation.

 

Pic 6. Comparison with 1944 and present aerial image

 

 

 

Pic 7: Archana and Unbi December,2010 ( Google Imagery)



  Picture 8: Northern side of UNBI in December 2009 (Google Earth Imagery)

 

LOCAL INTERPRETATION

      A lady residing on the northern edge of ‘Archana’ was interviewed. Her name is  Loitongbam Purnimashi aged 70 years. She said, “The name of the location is called Sekmai Sabal Awang Leikai ”.  She further added, there were mounds and earthworks which were levelled and they found broken earthen pots and charcoals in the adjoining area.

 

      The author met another local Manipuri who lives near the northern edge of ‘Unbi’.  His name is Kwairakpam Mani. He is 70 years of age. He said, “This earthwork was there since time immemorial, it was already there when i was born.”  He told us that the name of the locality is Sekmai Khunou.

 

 

Picture 9 :  Locals ( Kwairakpam Mani and  Loitongbam Purnimashi)

 

 

CONCLUSION

            It is very difficult to say when the structures of ‘Archana and Unbi’ were constructed. The Royal Chronicle of Manipuri Kings, Cheitharol Kumbaba has no mention of the earth work being constructed. It may be concluded that either the structures were constructed much before the Manipuri Royal Chronicle started recording the events in Manipur or it was constructed during the 7 years devastation of 1819-26 by the Burmese when the Manipuri Royal officials were not aware of the construction. 

 

   The presence of water moat around the boundaries of the structure signifies it was a defensive position or a military garrison. The exact era when “Archana and Unbi” were constructed can be known through proper scientific methods and research.

 

    What is certain is that the shape created by the earth work can only be seen from the air and presumably whoever built this, would never have seen the beauty of their labours.    It is an interesting and sobering fact that little has been present today of the beautiful structure and this important archaeological site will be engulfed and destroyed in few years with human habitation.  A quick and proactive research initiative with a clarion call can record its presence and significance for posterity.